alea-institute/alea-legal-benchmark-sentence-paragraph-boundaries

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8342558.json

"What is the standard of skill and care that reasonably competent professionals follow when acting under the same or similar circumstances; (2) That the defendant ... did not follow that standard of skill and

"What is the standard of skill and care that reasonably competent professionals follow when acting under the same or similar circumstances;<|sentence|> (2) That the defendant ... did not follow that standard of skill and

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5771126.json

to cooperate. {¶ 4} A master commissioner appointed by the board found that Siehl failed to respond to relator’s attempts to communicate with him, thereby violating Prof.Cond.R. 8.1(b) (prohibiting a lawyer

to cooperate.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> {¶ 4} A master commissioner appointed by the board found that Siehl failed to respond to relator’s attempts to communicate with him, thereby violating Prof.Cond.R. 8.1(b) (prohibiting a lawyer

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5500879.json

26,1972, one Sandra Brabaw filed a claim on behalf of her son, the appellant herein, in which it was alleged that the appellant was a posthumously born illegitimate child of the decedent and, consequently, entitled to death benefits. In the decision appealed from, the board rejected this claim, after finding that the appellant was not an "acknowledged illegitimate child dependent upon the deceased”

26,1972, one Sandra Brabaw filed a claim on behalf of her son, the appellant herein, in which it was alleged that the appellant was a posthumously born illegitimate child of the decedent and, consequently, entitled to death benefits.<|sentence|> In the decision appealed from, the board rejected this claim, after finding that the appellant was not an "acknowledged illegitimate child dependent upon the deceased”

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1504588.json

;” that the alleged wreck was caused by the negligence of the plaintiff, and not by the negligence of the defendant; that there was a “small depression” in said street, and that the defendant had placed lights there as a warning to travelers of the existence of said depression. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted to the overruling of its motion for

;” that the alleged wreck was caused by the negligence of the plaintiff, and not by the negligence of the defendant;<|sentence|> that there was a “small depression” in said street, and that the defendant had placed lights there as a warning to travelers of the existence of said depression.<|sentence|> The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.<|sentence|> The defendant excepted to the overruling of its motion for

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4163731.json

bases located within Texas; (2) Ranger employees sometimes work at or participate in training programs at a Texas facility owned by British Aerospace Engineering (“BAE”), a British military contractor; (3) a small number of Ranger employees undergo processing at a U.S. military facility in Texas prior to traveling to assignments overseas; (4) Ranger pays unemployment and franchise taxes to the State of Texas; (5) Ranger’s website can be accessed in Texas and contains email addresses for several Ranger employees. Examining Ranger’s Texas contacts in the aggregate

bases located within Texas;<|sentence|> (2) Ranger employees sometimes work at or participate in training programs at a Texas facility owned by British Aerospace Engineering (“BAE”), a British military contractor;<|sentence|> (3) a small number of Ranger employees undergo processing at a U.S. military facility in Texas prior to traveling to assignments overseas;<|sentence|> (4) Ranger pays unemployment and franchise taxes to the State of Texas;<|sentence|> (5) Ranger’s website can be accessed in Texas and contains email addresses for several Ranger employees.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> Examining Ranger’s Texas contacts in the aggregate

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7323133.json

Program (KYLAP) under his June 1, 2008 monitoring agreement, and that he attend the Ethics and Professionalism Enhancement Program offered by the KBA Office of Bar Counsel.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.state.gov/wp-json/wp/v2/state_report/252205.json

n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/section>\n\n\t

n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t<|paragraph|>\n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t<|paragraph|>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/section>\n\n\t

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2039442.json

on or about November 25, 1965, Prudential vacated and abandoned the demised premises “without proper notification * * * and without plaintiff’s consent” in violation of the terms of the lease; that during defendant’s tenancy the

on or about November 25, 1965, Prudential vacated and abandoned the demised premises “without proper notification * * * and without plaintiff’s consent” in violation of the terms of the lease;<|sentence|> that during defendant’s tenancy the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1304630.json

vrin*v. Janvrin, 58 N. H. 144. The general finding would remain, based upon all the evidence in the case, including that upon which the additional findings would be based, that the defendant was guilty of negligence, and that the plaintiff was not in fault. If the answers to the requests mot already answered should be most favorable to the defendant, they would present no legal reason for a judgment in- favor of the defendant, nor would they show that the conclusion of the referee is so much against

vrin*v. Janvrin, 58 N. H. 144.<|sentence|> The general finding would remain, based upon all the evidence in the case, including that upon which the additional findings would be based, that the defendant was guilty of negligence, and that the plaintiff was not in fault.<|sentence|> If the answers to the requests mot already answered should be most favorable to the defendant, they would present no legal reason for a judgment in- favor of the defendant, nor would they show that the conclusion of the referee is so much against

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5143283.json

A. Bartley, John T. Bartley and Rose A. Hayes, Appellants. Order denying defendants’ motion to strike the action from the Special Term calendar and to place it on the Trial Term calendar, to be tried by a jury, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants waived a trial by jury by failing to make a demand therefor pursuant to section 426 of the Civil

A. Bartley, John T. Bartley and Rose A. Hayes, Appellants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> Order denying defendants’ motion to strike the action from the Special Term calendar and to place it on the Trial Term calendar, to be tried by a jury, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.<|sentence|> Defendants waived a trial by jury by failing to make a demand therefor pursuant to section 426 of the Civil

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6601438.json

(New York). Opinion by Lawrence, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass aerators similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65882, the claim of the plaintiff was

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.mmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/mystic_aquarium_110512.pdf.json

general health of marine mammals, which includes (1) diet and nutrition, (2) disease, (3) immune function, (4) environmental stressors, and (5) toxicology. The Aquarium proposes to obtain samples from stranded animals abroad, live-captured animals taken by other permitted researchers, legal subsistence hunts, fisheries interactions, captive animals (including dolphins that are used in the Navy’s Marine Mammal Program), and animals in foreign countries that were collected legally within that country.

general health of marine mammals, which includes <|paragraph|> (1) diet and nutrition, (2) disease, (3) immune function, (4) environmental stressors, and (5) <|paragraph|> toxicology.<|sentence|> The Aquarium proposes to obtain samples from stranded animals abroad, live-captured <|paragraph|> animals taken by other permitted researchers, legal subsistence hunts, fisheries interactions, captive <|paragraph|> animals (including dolphins that are used in the Navy’s Marine Mammal Program), and animals in <|paragraph|> foreign countries that were collected legally within that country.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1544426.json

West 1992). The State points out that the nine-year sentence imposed in No. 93—CF—1214 was the first sentence imposed on the defendant in that cause. The State further points out that the six-year sentence that the defendant received in No. 93—CF—1213 after remand was six years less than the original sentence (12 years)

West 1992).<|sentence|><|paragraph|> The State points out that the nine-year sentence imposed in No. 93—CF—1214 was the first sentence imposed on the defendant in that cause.<|sentence|> The State further points out that the six-year sentence that the defendant received in No. 93—CF—1213 after remand was six years less than the original sentence (12 years)

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.fbi.gov/about/faqs/what-is-the-fbis-foreign-counterintelligence-responsibility.json

- USA.gov - White House - No FEAR Act - Equal Opportunity FBI.gov is

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10229996.json

Their proposition is that since appellee had an opportunity to introduce his proof and failed to avail himself of that right, and by his objections prevented appellants from introducing proof on the material allegations of his petition, he lost his right to try the case in Jefferson county. The case was tried on the theory, accepted as the law by the trial court, that appellee sustained his venue by the proof offered. We

Their proposition is that since appellee had an opportunity to introduce his proof and failed to avail himself of that right, and by his objections prevented appellants from introducing proof on the material allegations of his petition, he lost his right to try the case in Jefferson county.<|sentence|> The case was tried on the theory, accepted as the law by the trial court, that appellee sustained his venue by the proof offered.<|sentence|> We

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8892089.json

seen fit to enlarge the powers of the excise board bv conferring authority to increase any estimate certified to them, or to add items thereto when, in its opinion, the needs of the municipality shall so require. Section 5, c. 226, p. 412, Sess. Laws 1917. This section, however, has no application to the situation here presented. It is contended by defendant that atay illegality in the action of the excise board was cured by chapter 38, p. 101, Sess. Laws 1916, which undertook to validate levies for the

seen fit to enlarge the powers of the excise board bv conferring authority to increase any estimate certified to them, or to add items thereto when, in its opinion, the needs of the municipality shall so require.<|sentence|> Section 5, c. 226, p. 412, Sess. Laws 1917.<|sentence|> This section, however, has no application to the situation here presented.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> It is contended by defendant that atay illegality in the action of the excise board was cured by chapter 38, p. 101, Sess. Laws 1916, which undertook to validate levies for the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.usgs.gov/media/images/meandering-mississippi.json

USGS Store. ### Sources/Usage Public Domain. ### Geospatial Information ### Explore Search - Information Systems - Maps and Mapping -

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4563134.json

L. Bronson,*district attorney, for the respondent. Opinion by Hardin, P. J.; Follett and Martin, JJ., concurred. Conviction, order and judgment affirmed, and proceedings remitted to the Court of Oyer and

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1484514.json

few inches” to avoid the collision, the time of which was at night and lights on both automobiles were burning, — it was a question of fact for a jury whether the death of the person who was riding in the first automobile was proximately caused by the negligence of the driver of that automobile or the negligence of the driver of

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9667947.json

, Appellant, v. A & M STORES, INCORPORATED, et al., Appellees. No. 74-1125. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. Nov. 12, 1975. Rehearing Denied Dee. 8, 1975. PER CURIAM. Affirmed

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4432886.json

was either “getting a prospect or looking for one.” At no time did he state that he had permission, or understood that he had permission, to use the car for any purpose not connected with his employment. The plaintiff had the burden of proving that the car was being operated at

was either “getting a prospect or looking for one.”<|sentence|> At no time did he state that he had permission, or understood that he had permission, to use the car for any purpose not connected with his employment.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> The plaintiff had the burden of proving that the car was being operated at

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ams.usda.gov/node/39141.json

Grants & Opportunities Import/Export Certificates Laboratory Testing & Approvals Local Food Research and Development Market & Facility Design Market Research & Analysis Organic Certification & Accreditation Packers & Stockyards Plant Variety Protection Pesticide Data Program Regional Food Business Centers Seed Regulations and Testing Transportation Research & Analysis Warehouse Services Resources Resources Data Forms Interactive Resources Publications Reports & Presentations Commodity Procurement Commodity Procurement

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070670455.pdf.json

CLOSURE O Office of the Secretary (SECY) Items of Interest Week Ending February 16, 2007 Document Released to Public Date Subject Decision Documents 1. COMSECY-07-0001 1/23/07 Appointment to the Patients’ Rights Advocate Position for the Advisory

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1269974.json

[No. 31245-0-II. Division Two. February 8, 2005.] #### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Randy Lynn Watters, *Appellant.* Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 03-1-00087-6, James B. Sawyer II, J., entered November 24, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Morgan, A.C. J., and Hunt, J.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nationalguard.mil/Features/2008/Midwest-Flooding/index.html.json

wa sub-station - Midwestern Guardsmen Respond to Rising Flood Waters - Guard delivers pumps, water back to Cedar Rapids - Guard, Army Corps Provide Flood Relief - Trenton National Guard unit assists Iowa flood by way of South Dakota - Air

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1014495.json

K. Mitchell and Henry E. Keene, andjother parties interested, to his report. In his report on these exceptions he stated: “ The auditor has also been requested to report upon the construction of the last residuary clause in the will of Miss Sarah Lukens Keene; and also to report as to whom, under such construction, the shares of the estate of John Lukens, passing

K. Mitchell and Henry E. Keene, andjother parties interested, to his report.<|sentence|> In his report on these exceptions he stated: “ The auditor has also been requested to report upon the construction of the last residuary clause in the will of Miss Sarah Lukens Keene;<|sentence|> and also to report as to whom, under such construction, the shares of the estate of John Lukens, passing

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.census.gov/quickfacts/geo/chart/lakefentoncdpmichigan,detroitcitymichigan,US/PST045223.json

� Midland city, Michigan  Lincoln Park city, Michigan  Muskegon city, Michigan  Holland city, Michigan  Eastpointe city, Michigan  Bay City city, Michigan  Jackson city, Michigan  Burton city, Michigan  Oak Park city, Michigan 

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12169658.json

to be performed will probably cause injuries to others unless due precaution is taken to avoid harm. Under exception two Jones claims Ipalco was obligated under a specifically legally imposed duty to provide Decedent a safe place to work which duty was breached. Also, the *682Dangerous Occupation Act1 and certan administrative regulations2 obligated Ipalco to insure that the hoist equipment conformed

to be performed will probably cause injuries to others unless due precaution is taken to avoid harm.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> Under exception two Jones claims Ipalco was obligated under a specifically legally imposed duty to provide Decedent a safe place to work which duty was breached.<|sentence|> Also, the *682Dangerous Occupation Act1 and certan administrative regulations2 obligated Ipalco to insure that the hoist equipment conformed

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1595657.json

After a judgment was rendered in the court of ordinary against the plaintiff, he appealed the case to the Superior Court of Gordon County, and that court sustained a general demurrer to his petition, and the case was brought to this court. Under these facts this court has jurisdiction to review the judgment of the superior court sustaining the demurrer. *Reece v.

After a judgment was rendered in the court of ordinary against the plaintiff, he appealed the case to the Superior Court of Gordon County, and that court sustained a general demurrer to his petition, and the case was brought to this court.<|sentence|> Under these facts this court has jurisdiction to review the judgment of the superior court sustaining the demurrer.<|sentence|> *Reece v.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.acquisition.gov/far/34.005-5.json

SOFARS SOFARS TRANSFARS TRANSFARS AGAR AGAR AIDAR AIDAR CAR CAR DEAR DEAR DIAR DIAR DOLAR DOLAR Row 4 DOSAR DOSAR DTAR DTAR EDAR EDAR EPAAR EPAAR FEHBAR FEHBAR GSAM/R GSAM/R HHSAR HHSAR HSAR HSAR Row 5 HUDAR HUDAR IAAR IAAR JAR JAR LIFAR LIFAR NFS NFS NRCAR NRCAR

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nicic.gov/resources/resources-topics-and-roles/topics/correctional-anti-human-trafficking-initiative-cahti.json

picked by our library team around this topic. If you would like additional research assistance on this topic, please contact our help desk. They have access to specialized databases and thousands of resources you won't find online. Click on a grey box below to browse resources in that section. Accordion Related Information America's outcasts: the women trapped in a cruel cycle of exploitation (2018) Victims Behind Bars: Sex Trafficking of Women Offenders (2018) "Join the Solution" - new Spanish-language awareness

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7615013.json

S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Where a note is made payable to two or more payees in the conjunctive, payment made to only one of the payees does not discharge the maker’s obligations under the note. § 673.116, Fla.Stat. (1983).1 In the instant case the note was made payable to the appellant and a co-payee and payment by the Tojeiros was

S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.<|paragraph|> PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|> Where a note is made payable to two or more payees in the conjunctive, payment made to only one of the payees does not discharge the maker’s obligations under the note.<|sentence|> § 673.116, Fla.Stat. (1983).1<|sentence|> In the instant case the note was made payable to the appellant and a co-payee and payment by the Tojeiros was

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12111531.json

of the 109 acres, as well as Del Cerro’s interest in the option payments and pledge. It was this interest, along with all of World Minerals’ title and interest in the

of the 109 acres, as well as Del Cerro’s interest in the option payments and pledge.<|sentence|> It was this interest, along with all of World Minerals’ title and interest in the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2246490.json

was legal and valid, because the statute of 1851 declared that the assessment should be made for all personal estate *owned*by the person assessed. Although this language is general and broad enough to include all the personal estate of the person assessed, wheresoever it *357may be situated, the Court of Appeals, in the case already referred to, have held that it should not be so construed. But that its terms must be so far restricted as to confine them to property within this state. The fact, therefore, that the property was owned by the relator was not

was legal and valid, because the statute of 1851 declared that the assessment should be made for all personal estate *owned*by the person assessed.<|sentence|> Although this language is general and broad enough to include all the personal estate of the person assessed, wheresoever it *357may be situated, the Court of Appeals, in the case already referred to, have held that it should not be so construed.<|sentence|> But that its terms must be so far restricted as to confine them to property within this state.<|sentence|> The fact, therefore, that the property was owned by the relator was not

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.archives.gov/nhprc/projects/catalog/franklin-institute.json

- Genealogists - Members of Congress - Preservation - Records Managers - The Press ## Publications - Today's *Federal Register* - Prologue Magazine - Subscribe to Email Newsletters - All Publications ## Orgs. & Offices - Center for Legislative Archives

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.arc.gov/index.html?p=16611.json

Access to Capital Program Appalachian Regional Energy Hub Initiative J-1 Visa Waiver Program Local Access Road Program Contract Opportunities Applicant Resources Grantee Resources Approved ARC Projects Research and Data Research Reports Evaluations Maps Data Report Tool Fact Sheets and Infographics Academies and Institutes Appalachian Collegiate Research Initiative Appalachian Entrepreneurship Academy Appalachian Leadership Institute Appalachian STEM Academy About ARC

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ars.usda.gov/arsuserfiles/20361500/pdf_pubs/P1357.pdf.json

= WHAs041 [W0W21[H&041 [29] [30] [31] J&(int) = [XAsOi] [H ‘1 [X(OH)21 [H&

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10411679.json

190 Colo. 177, 544 P.2d 991 (1976). Here, the trial court discounted the testimony of Richardson’s daughter and son-in-law on the basis of

190 Colo. 177, 544 P.2d 991 (1976).<|sentence|> Here, the trial court discounted the testimony of Richardson’s daughter and son-in-law on the basis of

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8813625.json

P.R.A. see. 481) en lo que concierne a personas que supervisen obreros mientras se encuentren en el sitio de trabajo. 2 (z) Corresponde con el hallazgo en la autopsia de herida de hala que

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3770&f[1]=disease:3772&f[2]=topic:4299&f[3]=topic:13724&f[4]=type:publications.json

ying. Towards Zero TB Deaths in Children No More Crying, No More Dying. Towards Zero TB Deaths in Children WHO and the Stop TB Partnership point to three

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10657967.json

lots or parcels separately from the remaining property. At the foreclosure sale, or in writing at least ten days prior to the sale, the debt- or may direct the

lots or parcels separately from the remaining property.<|sentence|> At the foreclosure sale, or in writing at least ten days prior to the sale, the debt- or may direct the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6086196.json

,450.21, and asserts a deficiency as to each of the taxpayers for 1920 in the amount of $2,784.85. The petitioners seek a redetermination of their tax liability

,450.21, and asserts a deficiency as to each of the taxpayers for 1920 in the amount of $2,784.85.<|sentence|> The petitioners seek a redetermination of their tax liability

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7032346.json

argues that > "Ford has failed to meet its burden of proving any element of its claim — that it suffered any prejudice as a result of the jury selection process; that the jury panel was not randomly selected; that there was a systematic exclusion of a specific group of people; or that fraud was somehow involved. Absent any such proof, Ford is left only with its unsupported complaints

argues that > "Ford has failed to meet its burden of proving any element of its claim — that it suffered any prejudice as a result of the jury selection process;<|sentence|> that the jury panel was not randomly selected;<|sentence|> that there was a systematic exclusion of a specific group of people;<|sentence|> or that fraud was somehow involved.<|sentence|> Absent any such proof, Ford is left only with its unsupported complaints

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2236951.json

, the legal intern stated: > “We have something extra in this case, we have fingerprints. You have heard that testimony. I am not going to go through it. One thing that hasn’t been mentioned, doesn’t it seem a little bit odd to you that of all of the people, all of the people’s fingerprints that were found on that car, it just happened to be the fingerprints of the man she picked out, *that she picked out of some police pictures? Doesn’t that seem awfully funny? She doesn’t know when she

, the legal intern stated:<|paragraph|> > “We have something extra in this case, we have fingerprints.<|sentence|> You have heard that testimony.<|sentence|> I am not going to go through it.<|sentence|> One thing that hasn’t been mentioned, doesn’t it seem a little bit odd to you that of all of the people, all of the people’s fingerprints that were found on that car, it just happened to be the fingerprints of the man she picked out, *that she picked out of some police pictures?<|sentence|> Doesn’t that seem awfully funny?<|sentence|> She doesn’t know when she

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10598620.json

pages 26 through 28. Jones was heard telling another inmate “they’re some prejudiced mother fuckers” after another inmate received a disciplinary report. When an officer asked Jones about his comment, he said it was

pages 26 through 28.<|sentence|> Jones was heard telling another inmate “they’re some prejudiced mother fuckers” after another inmate received a disciplinary report.<|sentence|> When an officer asked Jones about his comment, he said it was

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3873853.json

During the investigation, four “slap on” GPS tracking devices, which did not require permanent installation, were placed on twelve different vehicles, as set forth below, Opp. at 2-39: > • A Nissan registered to and utilized by Hayes; > • A Range Rover registered to Deneen Bolden and utilized by Hayes; > • A Honda Crosstour registered to and utilized by Wilford; > • A Jeep registered to BLOW IT OFF POWER WASHING and utilized by Hawkins; > • An Acura 2

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/760188.json

*Pavish*court held that, under the police civil service system, the chief did not have sufficient control over the appointment of the policemen to warrant similar liability. Since, in 1958, deputy sheriffs were brought under a form of civil service, the sheriff and his bond argue that the Pavish principle should now apply to county sheriffs, relieving them from such liability.

*Pavish*court held that, under the police civil service system, the chief did not have sufficient control over the appointment of the policemen to warrant similar liability.<|sentence|> Since, in 1958, deputy sheriffs were brought under a form of civil service, the sheriff and his bond argue that the Pavish principle should now apply to county sheriffs, relieving them from such liability.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4367153.json

not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hakiih Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct an alleged error in the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. Although the district court correctly construed the motion as a motion for reconsideration, *cf.*Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 (“After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the

not binding precedent in this circuit.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> PER CURIAM:<|paragraph|> Hakiih Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct an alleged error in the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction.<|sentence|> Although the district court correctly construed the motion as a motion for reconsideration, *cf.*Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 (“After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10545175.json

Robert Trusz of the Chicago Police Department prepared an affidavit to obtain a warrant to search Imperial Jewelers. The warrant was issued authorizing the seizure of a camera and seven items of jewelry. On March 27, 1982, Officer Trusz and three other police officers, led

Robert Trusz of the Chicago Police Department prepared an affidavit to obtain a warrant to search Imperial Jewelers.<|sentence|> The warrant was issued authorizing the seizure of a camera and seven items of jewelry.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> On March 27, 1982, Officer Trusz and three other police officers, led

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4739221.json

Board, Respondent. Joseph Dellatero, Claimant, Appellant, v. Benjamin Wolff and Another, Respondents. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, and motion *

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7037216.json

Florida, Third District. Jan. 24, 2011. Arnstein <& Lehr, Franklin L. Zemel, and Natalie F. Guerra-Valdes, Fort Laud-erdale; Ginnis & Groysman and Roman Groysman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants. Robert P. Frankel, Miami, for appellee. Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and SALTER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. *See*

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2143972.json

to render it impossible to determine that said property was in the city of Pasadena, where the delinquent tax list stated that the property was in Pasadena, and the lower court adjudged from all the evidence in the case that the property levied upon was so situated, and it nowhere appears that the assessor failed to perform his duty to levy upon the property situated only in said city of Pasadena for the purpose of raising funds for the schools of the Pasadena School District. *4388. Effect on tax sale proceedings of misnomer of owner, note, Ann. Cas. 1918D, 573. See, also, 26

to render it impossible to determine that said property was in the city of Pasadena, where the delinquent tax list stated that the property was in Pasadena, and the lower court adjudged from all the evidence in the case that the property levied upon was so situated, and it nowhere appears that the assessor failed to perform his duty to levy upon the property situated only in said city of Pasadena for the purpose of raising funds for the schools of the Pasadena School District.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> *4388. Effect on tax sale proceedings of misnomer of owner, note, Ann. Cas. 1918D, 573.<|sentence|> See, also, 26

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9521640.json

. Great Southern Lumber Co.,*131 La. 408, 59 So. 833 (La.1912). Furthermore, under Louisiana Law, the principal of vicarious liability is well settled. La.Civ.Code art. 2320. What possible public policy would prevent an employer from being liable for the torts of its employees committed during the course of his employment? In my view, this is not and should not be the law in the area of business

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.irs.gov/pub/fatca/SampleSponsoredEntityList.xml.json

tns:SDClassificationCd>SD</tns:SDClassificationCd> </tns:SponsoredEntity> <tns:SponsoredEntity> <

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1477643.json

P.2d 280 #### Gregory Allen STANHOPE v. STATE of Arizona; Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. No. CV-92-0122-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona. Oct.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7006128.json

AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. No. 2013-CC-1476. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 26, 2013. In re Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 2010-5885; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 13-00390. Granted in part. The matter is remanded to the district court to recalculate the suspensive appeal bond in light of the March 6, 2013 judgment on the motion for new trial.

AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.<|paragraph|> No. 2013-CC-1476.<|paragraph|> Supreme Court of Louisiana.<|paragraph|> June 26, 2013.<|paragraph|> In re Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 2010-5885; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 13-00390.<|paragraph|> Granted in part.<|sentence|> The matter is remanded to the district court to recalculate the suspensive appeal bond in light of the March 6, 2013 judgment on the motion for new trial.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1086250.json

appeal the conviction and judgment was affirmed. People v. Austin, 374 Ill. 28, 27 N.E.2d 830. At the outset we are met with the contention that the allegations in the defendant’s answer and intervenor’s petition, that plaintiff feloniously caused the death, and did feloniously kill and murder the insured, are mere conclusions, furnishing no ground for a summary judgment against the plaintiff. In support of this contention, she argues that in murder cases there are many means by which the killing may have been accomplished, namely, by shooting, stabbing and poisoning, and the defense

appeal the conviction and judgment was affirmed.<|sentence|> People v. Austin, 374 Ill. 28, 27 N.E.2d 830.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> At the outset we are met with the contention that the allegations in the defendant’s answer and intervenor’s petition, that plaintiff feloniously caused the death, and did feloniously kill and murder the insured, are mere conclusions, furnishing no ground for a summary judgment against the plaintiff.<|sentence|> In support of this contention, she argues that in murder cases there are many means by which the killing may have been accomplished, namely, by shooting, stabbing and poisoning, and the defense

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.fec.gov/resources/campaign-finance-statistics/2020/tables/pac/PAC5b_2020_18m.xlsx.json

# PAC Table 5b &"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.

# PAC Table 5b<|paragraph|> &"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2016/october/increased-consumer-sensitivity-to-food-safety-raised-financial-costs-of-ground-beef-recalls/index.html.json

of ground beef decreased by an average of 0.26 pounds per person in the areas where recalls occurred. In the pre-BSE period, FSIS recalls of ground beef were not followed by measurable changes in consumers’ probability of purchasing ground beef or the amount of ground beef purchased.

of ground beef decreased by an average of 0.26 pounds per person in the areas where recalls occurred.<|sentence|> In the pre-BSE period, FSIS recalls of ground beef were not followed by measurable changes in consumers’ probability of purchasing ground beef or the amount of ground beef purchased.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6489904.json

Except as otherwise provided in this section, the taxable income of the estate shall be computed in the same manner as for an individual. The tax shall be computed on such taxable income *and shall be paid by the trustee."*Section 1398(c)(1), Title 26, United States Code. (Emphasis added.) 6 . The respondent is nevertheless requested, in its response to this order, to reply to the contentions made on

Except as otherwise provided in this section, the taxable income of the estate shall be computed in the same manner as for an individual.<|sentence|> The tax shall be computed on such taxable income *and shall be paid by the trustee."*Section 1398(c)(1), Title 26, United States Code.<|sentence|> (Emphasis added.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|> 6 . The respondent is nevertheless requested, in its response to this order, to reply to the contentions made on

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1264494.json

v. *Strong,*44 *Ga.*636, was, as appears from an opinion subsequently filed in the ease, improvidently rendered, and did not express the views of the court. See the criticism in

v. *Strong,*44 *Ga.*636, was, as appears from an opinion subsequently filed in the ease, improvidently rendered, and did not express the views of the court.<|sentence|> See the criticism in

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12058553.json

by this action with respect to Count II did not allow a separate recovery for Appellees. The court’s ruling with respect to both Counts I and II permitted Appellees to recover the amount due them on the Note, plus interest. The final question presented in this appeal concerns the testimony of Ronald Siegel, Appellee-Weisenberg’s counsel at the closing. Appellants contend that he was wrongly allowed to testify as an expert witness even though he was not listed as such and no expert report was attached to Appellees pre-trial statement. At trial Attorney Siegel was asked to describe the closing, who was present, what documents were executed

by this action with respect to Count II did not allow a separate recovery for Appellees.<|sentence|> The court’s ruling with respect to both Counts I and II permitted Appellees to recover the amount due them on the Note, plus interest.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> The final question presented in this appeal concerns the testimony of Ronald Siegel, Appellee-Weisenberg’s counsel at the closing.<|sentence|> Appellants contend that he was wrongly allowed to testify as an expert witness even though he was not listed as such and no expert report was attached to Appellees pre-trial statement.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> At trial Attorney Siegel was asked to describe the closing, who was present, what documents were executed

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/801238.json

Benjamin Stilwell. The defendants have no more to do with those accounts than the complainants themselves have. But the complainants have no more right here, in the capacity of next of kin and heirs at law of Benjamin Stilwell, than the defendants have

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8639027.json

, 527; 28 W. Va. 322; 12 Pet. 164; 20 How. 541; 52 Miss. 457; 108U. S. 292; 7 Rob. Pr. (App.) 1087; Dest. Rem. Gas. § 110 aud n.; Dill. Rem. Caus. § 87. T. B. Swann for appellees

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3872814.json

v. State of Kansas,*766 F.Supp. 1005 (D.Kan.1991); *Tranello v. Frey,*758 F.Supp. 841 (W.D.N.Y.1991), *aff'd,*962 F.2d 244 (2d Cir.1991), *cert. denied, sub nom, County of Monroe v. Tranello,*

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/170575.json

of decedents in kind, and being a court of original and competent jurisdiction for that purpose, it must be conclusively presumed that the court had before it all necessary and competent evidence to authorize the judgment. In these circumstances, the courts are always extremely loath to enter upon an investigation de novo. Especially is this true in the absence of fraud; and in this case, while there are frequent allegations of fraud, no sufficient facts are alleged to show that the charge

of decedents in kind, and being a court of original and competent jurisdiction for that purpose, it must be conclusively presumed that the court had before it all necessary and competent evidence to authorize the judgment.<|sentence|> In these circumstances, the courts are always extremely loath to enter upon an investigation de novo.<|sentence|> Especially is this true in the absence of fraud;<|sentence|> and in this case, while there are frequent allegations of fraud, no sufficient facts are alleged to show that the charge

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1804996.json

that the commissioners had theretofore concluded their examination of the evidence. Hearing upon objections to report of commissioners of estimate and assessment, and upon motion to confirm report as to certain awards. John P. Dunn and Thomas C. Blake, for City of New York. Henry H. Man, for Spencer trustees. James A. Deering, for

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1601509.json

is to pre*456vent any retail outlet becoming tied to any particular source of supply because of advertising furnished; and that any manufacturer or wholesaler furnishing material or service in excess of the amount specified will be considered by the commission as having an interest in the business. In argument it is claimed on behalf of the commission that the purpose of these three sections is the same; to prevent the evil

is to pre*456vent any retail outlet becoming tied to any particular source of supply because of advertising furnished; and that any manufacturer or wholesaler furnishing material or service in excess of the amount specified will be considered by the commission as having an interest in the business.<|sentence|> In argument it is claimed on behalf of the commission that the purpose of these three sections is the same; to prevent the evil

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/list?awardee=&city=Richmond&combine_awards=&field_award_status_value=All&field_funding_type_value=All&field_served_nationally_value=All&fiscal_year=&form_topic=&state=VA&order=field_fiscal_year&sort=asc.json

06 DNA Capacity Enhancement Program Solicitation Commonwealth of Virginia VA 2006-DN-BX-K153 $768,640 Closed2006 FY 2006 Forensic Casework DNA Backlog Reduction Program - Virginia Department of Forensic Science NIJ FY06 Forensic Casework DNA Backlog Reduction Program Grant Announcement Commonwealth of Virginia VA 2006-DN-BX-K120 $385,992 Closed2006 Paul Coverdell National Forensic Science Improvement. NIJ FY06 Coverdell Forensic

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.bea.gov/system/files/2021-06/covid-workbook.pdf.json

-149.2 -57.2 471.9 1,438.9 -882.5 4 Population (midperiod, persons) 764,762 765,074 765,243 765,601 766,086 766,155 312 169 358 485 69 5 Per capita personal income (dollars) 57,643 57,963 62,285 57,956 59,346 65,621 320 4,322 -4,329 1,390 6,275 Derivation of personal income

-149.2 -57.2 471.9 1,438.9 -882.5<|paragraph|> 4 Population (midperiod, persons) 764,762 765,074 765,243 765,601 766,086 766,155 312 169 358 485 69<|paragraph|> 5 Per capita personal income (dollars) 57,643 57,963 62,285 57,956 59,346 65,621 320 4,322 -4,329 1,390 6,275<|paragraph|> Derivation of personal income

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/192791.json

scope of the written stipulation of facts entered into between the parties. This constitutes, in our judgment, the only issue meriting treatment beyond that already afforded by the court below. To protect themselves and Cork Street in the state action, INA and Northwestern joined to provide Cork Street’s defense. Later, while this action was pending, the state action was compromised and settled, the two insurance companies splitting the $60,000 agreed settlement figure and costs of defense, with ultimate responsibility for the ■ whole to await the District Court’s decision on the coverage issue.

scope of the written stipulation of facts entered into between the parties.<|sentence|> This constitutes, in our judgment, the only issue meriting treatment beyond that already afforded by the court below.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> To protect themselves and Cork Street in the state action, INA and Northwestern joined to provide Cork Street’s defense.<|sentence|> Later, while this action was pending, the state action was compromised and settled, the two insurance companies splitting the $60,000 agreed settlement figure and costs of defense, with ultimate responsibility for the ■ whole to await the District Court’s decision on the coverage issue.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10234137.json

Oct. 25, 1939. Henry Taylor, of Temple, for appellant. Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. GRAVES, Judge. The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at twenty-five days confinement in the county jail and a fine of $50. The indictment appears

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8847049.json

, 1847, c. 28, § 1, that “any person or corporation aggrieved by any decision of any Court of County Commissioners, on an application to lay out, alter or discontinue any highways, may appeal to the District Court held in

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.acquisition.gov/dars/subpart-4.1-––-contract-execution.json

33Part 34Part 35Part 36Part 37Part 38Part 39Part 40Part 41Part 42Part 43Part 44Part 45Part 46Part 47Part 48Part

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2270734.json

ellis S. Nelson *vs.*The Same. A note payable on demand must be demanded, and notice of non-payment given to the indorser, within a reasonable time after the date, in order to charge him as indorser; and if not so demanded and notice given, the indorser is discharged. What is a reasonable time is a mixed question of law and fact, in determining which the following considerations may be taken into the account. 1st. The residence of the

ellis S. Nelson *vs.*The Same.<|paragraph|> A note payable on demand must be demanded, and notice of non-payment given to the indorser, within a reasonable time after the date, in order to charge him as indorser;<|sentence|> and if not so demanded and notice given, the indorser is discharged.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> What is a reasonable time is a mixed question of law and fact, in determining which the following considerations may be taken into the account.<|sentence|> 1st. The residence of the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2130669.json

1 Her suit was filed on September 10,1974, more than two years after she reached the age of 18 on July 13, 1972. The trial judge sustained defendants’ plea of the statute of limitations holding

1 Her suit was filed on September 10,1974, more than two years after she reached the age of 18 on July 13, 1972.<|sentence|> The trial judge sustained defendants’ plea of the statute of limitations holding

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10660605.json

05 (1986). The record indicates the earliest that plaintiffs and the city had knowledge of the defective condition of the lot for building purposes was the meeting on March 8, 1978, at the building site. On June 20, 1979

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1997916.json

, 1844. On the same day, the corporation made a conveyance accordingly, under its corporate seal, which was accepted by the appellants as such trustees ; and was duly recorded as a conveyance of real estate on the 14th of the same month. Two days after the recording of this conveyance in trust, Alice Lalor and others, as the personal representatives of J. A. Neil deceased, recovered a judgment against the corporation for a debt

, 1844.<|sentence|> On the same day, the corporation made a conveyance accordingly, under its corporate seal, which was accepted by the appellants as such trustees ; and was duly recorded as a conveyance of real estate on the 14th of the same month.<|sentence|> Two days after the recording of this conveyance in trust, Alice Lalor and others, as the personal representatives of J. A. Neil deceased, recovered a judgment against the corporation for a debt

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7013455.json

order striking Bovino’s petition is reversed without prejudice to the trial court’s striking the pleadings on any other basis, if applicable, and we remand for further proceedings. *Reversed and Remanded.* WARNER, STEVENSON, JJ., and STONE, BARRY J., Senior Judge, concur

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12695556.json

we also conclude that the circuit court's November 5, 2015, order removing the administration of Rheba's estate from the probate court is void and that, as a result

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8517724.json

judgment on a joint obligation against one or more joint obligors is a bar to an action against any other joint obligor (15 R. C. L. 783), and it is suggested that to hold otherwise would be to permit two or more judgments to be entered on a single debt. The rule above has no application to the case at bar, as is clearly pointed out in the text from which it is taken, “

judgment on a joint obligation against one or more joint obligors is a bar to an action against any other joint obligor (15 R. C. L. 783), and it is suggested that to hold otherwise would be to permit two or more judgments to be entered on a single debt.<|sentence|> The rule above has no application to the case at bar, as is clearly pointed out in the text from which it is taken, “

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400530/pdf/1718/Table_53_RST_GEN_17.pdf.json

4.92) 20 - 39.............. 766 65 (2.5) 71.0 (3.89) 12.8 (1.21) 18 (1.4) 70.6

4.92)<|sentence|><|paragraph|> 20 - 39.............. 766 65 (2.5) 71.0 (3.89) 12.8 (1.21) 18 (1.4) 70.6

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9299764.json

fact that an officer or director breached a duty to the corporation, however, is not determinative of the issue before the Court. If such a statute did control, a corporation could never be held criminally or civilly responsible for its wrongful intentional conduct because every wrongful intentional act is contrary to the best interests of a corporation. With that said, Maurer’s actions were not only that of an officer and di*1073rector, but his actions were that of the corporation. See 10 Couch on Ins. § 149:51

fact that an officer or director breached a duty to the corporation, however, is not determinative of the issue before the Court.<|sentence|> If such a statute did control, a corporation could never be held criminally or civilly responsible for its wrongful intentional conduct because every wrongful intentional act is contrary to the best interests of a corporation.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> With that said, Maurer’s actions were not only that of an officer and di*1073rector, but his actions were that of the corporation.<|sentence|> See 10 Couch on Ins. § 149:51

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1155186.json

, Harrison Kohler, Staff Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee. In the case before us the remark was indirect insofar as the defendant’s failure to testify is concerned. If the remark were a prohibited comment, it was not extensive, no inference of guilt from silence was stressed, no jury was present, and there was virtually no evidence to support an acquittal. The remark by the prosecutor in this case, if constitutional error, was harmless, Schneble v. Florida, 405 U. S. 427 (92 SC 1056, 31 LE2d 340) (1972). *

, Harrison Kohler, Staff Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> In the case before us the remark was indirect insofar as the defendant’s failure to testify is concerned.<|sentence|> If the remark were a prohibited comment, it was not extensive, no inference of guilt from silence was stressed, no jury was present, and there was virtually no evidence to support an acquittal.<|sentence|> The remark by the prosecutor in this case, if constitutional error, was harmless, Schneble v. Florida, 405 U. S. 427 (92 SC 1056, 31 LE2d 340) (1972).<|sentence|><|paragraph|> *

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/630414.json

assessors; and that it does not appear to have been improved land — are errors, which, if they exist, the collector is not responsible for. A collector is responsible for no illegalities but his own. *Nowell v. Tripp,*61 Maine, 426. The fourth objection, that parol evidence was not admissible to

assessors; and that it does not appear to have been improved land — are errors, which, if they exist, the collector is not responsible for.<|sentence|> A collector is responsible for no illegalities but his own.<|sentence|> *Nowell v. Tripp,*61 Maine, 426.<|paragraph|> The fourth objection, that parol evidence was not admissible to

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2351409.json

he might be compelled to keep his engagement, when the corporation might deem the safety of its property and of the passengers and freight upon the road to require the fence to be built or repaired. The statute relates to matters exclusively between the railroad corporation and the owners of land bordering upon the road. It imposes no duty in which the public in general have an interest, or of which the public have any means to enforce the discharge. Ordinarily and aside from any statute, we apprehend that It is not incumbent upon any individual or corporation to fence his ground against the highway, nor is any.one liable for

he might be compelled to keep his engagement, when the corporation might deem the safety of its property and of the passengers and freight upon the road to require the fence to be built or repaired.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> The statute relates to matters exclusively between the railroad corporation and the owners of land bordering upon the road.<|sentence|> It imposes no duty in which the public in general have an interest, or of which the public have any means to enforce the discharge.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> Ordinarily and aside from any statute, we apprehend that It is not incumbent upon any individual or corporation to fence his ground against the highway, nor is any.one liable for

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/443397.json

aid her in its collection, when if the award had been made regularly in this state they would do so, would have little to commend it. Such a view disregards the whole purpose of awarding alimony or support money to a wife and child. The need is not affected by the place of award. The assertion of the right in a different state cannot

aid her in its collection, when if the award had been made regularly in this state they would do so, would have little to commend it.<|sentence|> Such a view disregards the whole purpose of awarding alimony or support money to a wife and child.<|sentence|> The need is not affected by the place of award.<|sentence|> The assertion of the right in a different state cannot

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1810851.json

is so conflicting and the bill rendered so improbable that the trial judge says: “Mr. MeNemey in his testimony claimed that he was paid in full for the original construction of the boat. I am satisfied that either that was not so and he is now trying to collect it in this proceeding or, if it was

is so conflicting and the bill rendered so improbable that the trial judge says: “Mr. MeNemey in his testimony claimed that he was paid in full for the original construction of the boat.<|sentence|> I am satisfied that either that was not so and he is now trying to collect it in this proceeding or, if it was

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9351770.json

of which a reasonable person would have known.” *Harlow v. Fitzgerald,*457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982). When conducting a qualified immunity analysis, the court first considers “whether plaintiff’s allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation.” *Hope v. Pelzer,*536 U.S. 730, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 2513, 153 L.Ed.2d 666 (2002). “If no constitutional right would have been violated were the allegations established, there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity

of which a reasonable person would have known.”<|sentence|> *Harlow v. Fitzgerald,*457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982).<|sentence|> When conducting a qualified immunity analysis, the court first considers “whether plaintiff’s allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation.”<|sentence|> *Hope v. Pelzer,*536 U.S. 730, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 2513, 153 L.Ed.2d 666 (2002).<|sentence|> “If no constitutional right would have been violated were the allegations established, there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.census.gov/quickfacts/geo/chart/crotononhudsonvillagenewyork,newyorkcitynewyork,US/PST045223.json

 Monroe village, New York  Fredonia village, New York  Rensselaer city, New York  Ogdensburg city, New York  Newark village, New York

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/766036.json

then and there well knew, to wit: at on the 26th of A. D. 1888. And the plaintiff further avers that the defendant was not then and there the owner of

then and there well knew, to wit: at on the 26th of A. D. 1888.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> And the plaintiff further avers that the defendant was not then and there the owner of

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1583209.json

U.S.C. § 1104(b), which is applicable in “non-pilot” areas and is identical in all material respects to section 151104(b) except that a trustee has no standing under section 1104(b) to move for the appointment of an examiner. Because these two code provi*478sions have identical provisions, findings with respect to a section 151104(b) motion would apply with equal force to a section 1104(b) motion. The issue of mootness thus narrows to a single inquiry: whether the Massachusetts bankruptcy court’s disposition has

U.S.C. § 1104(b), which is applicable in “non-pilot” areas and is identical in all material respects to section 151104(b) except that a trustee has no standing under section 1104(b) to move for the appointment of an examiner.<|sentence|> Because these two code provi*478sions have identical provisions, findings with respect to a section 151104(b) motion would apply with equal force to a section 1104(b) motion.<|sentence|> The issue of mootness thus narrows to a single inquiry: whether the Massachusetts bankruptcy court’s disposition has

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/health-strategies/diabetes/interventions/index.html.json

Plan Dedicated Resources Communications Workplace Health Informatics Implementationplus icon Health-Related Programs Health-related Policies Health Benefits Environmental Support Evaluationplus icon Worker Productivity Measures Health Care Costs Measures Health Outcomes Measures Organizational Change Measures Workplace Health Strategiesplus icon Alcohol & Substance Misuseplus icon Interventionsplus icon Programs Policies Benefits Environmental Support Evaluation Measuresplus icon Worker Productivity Health Care Cost Health Outcomes Organizational Change

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12332.json

No. D-1244. #### In re Disbarment of Gordon. [For earlier order herein, see 507 U. S. 958.] Disbarment entered.

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/25673.json

the indictment charging assault *894in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions because the complainant’s testimony was contradictory and incredible is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10) and, in any event, is without merit. However, we find that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of robbery in the second degree inasmuch as the

the indictment charging assault *894in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions because the complainant’s testimony was contradictory and incredible is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10) and, in any event, is without merit.<|sentence|> However, we find that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of robbery in the second degree inasmuch as the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6722829.json

who deal with him. The action is founded upon the act of congress of July 2, 1890, entitled'“An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies” (26 Stat. 209). William F. Ran del, for complainant. Edward 0. Boardman, for defendants. COXE, District Judge. At the argument the counsel for the complainant was asked whether he sought to maintain this action under the general equity principles of the common law or under the provisions of the act of July 2, 1890. He answered that it

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/628781.json

either to build his part of the fence, or pay his neighbor for building it for him. But this jurisdiction is made to depend upon certain preliminary requirements, among which is proof of a division of the fence in controversy, (1) by an assignment made by the fence viewers, (2) by agreement of the parties, or (3) by prescription, based upon the presumption of a division the evidence of which is lost. This conclusion seems to be fully sustained by an analysis of the sections of the statute providing the procedure necessary to give jurisdiction to the fence viewers. Section 1. Specifies

either to build his part of the fence, or pay his neighbor for building it for him.<|sentence|> But this jurisdiction is made to depend upon certain preliminary requirements, among which is proof of a division of the fence in controversy, (1) by an assignment made by the fence viewers, (2) by agreement of the parties, or (3) by prescription, based upon the presumption of a division the evidence of which is lost.<|sentence|> This conclusion seems to be fully sustained by an analysis of the sections of the statute providing the procedure necessary to give jurisdiction to the fence viewers.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> Section 1.<|sentence|> Specifies

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.centcom.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=6&ModuleId=1231&Article=903919.json

brain tumor. At the time of his death, the detainee was receiving medical care at Craig Combat Surgical Hospital, a nearby U.S. medical facility. As a compassionate and humanitarian gesture, Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435 worked with Afghan authorities and the International Committee of the Red Cross to contact family members and arrange visitations with the

brain tumor.<|sentence|> At the time of his death, the detainee was receiving medical care at Craig Combat Surgical Hospital, a nearby U.S. medical facility.<|sentence|><|paragraph|> As a compassionate and humanitarian gesture, Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435 worked with Afghan authorities and the International Committee of the Red Cross to contact family members and arrange visitations with the

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8818770.json

any royalty that may have been derived from any future production under an existing or future lease, of which no disposition is specifically made under the will, except to such an extent that the will may have had the effect of disposing of the portion of

s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/index.html?seqNo115=387216.json

and relative abundance of pectinolytic bacterial genus, Lachnospira, in the gut microbial community. Return to top Connect with ARS Sign up ARS Home USDA.gov Plain Writing Policies & Links Civil Rights Statements FOIA Accessibility Statement Privacy Policy Non-Discrimination Statement Quality of Information USA.gov White