SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models
Paper
โข
2504.05299
โข
Published
โข
158
Hugging Test Lab
company
AI & ML interests
Offering a great user experience for organizations on Hugging Face!
Recent Activity
View all activity
HF-test-lab's activity
reach-vbย
authored
a
paper
7 days ago
jeffboudierย
posted
an
update
10 days ago
Post
2086
Llama4 is out and Scout is already on the Dell Enterprise Hub to deploy on Dell systems ๐ dell.huggingface.co
jeffboudierย
posted
an
update
13 days ago
Post
1501
Enterprise orgs now enable serverless Inference Providers for all members
- includes $2 free usage per org member (e.g. an Enterprise org with 1,000 members share $2,000 free credit each month)
- admins can set a monthly spend limit for the entire org
- works today with Together, fal, Novita, Cerebras and HF Inference.
Here's the doc to bill Inference Providers usage to your org: https://huggingface.co/docs/inference-providers/pricing#organization-billing
- includes $2 free usage per org member (e.g. an Enterprise org with 1,000 members share $2,000 free credit each month)
- admins can set a monthly spend limit for the entire org
- works today with Together, fal, Novita, Cerebras and HF Inference.
Here's the doc to bill Inference Providers usage to your org: https://huggingface.co/docs/inference-providers/pricing#organization-billing
- 2 replies
Post
2136
๐ DeepSeek R1 moment has come for GUI agents: Rule-based Reinforcement Learning gives better results than SFT with 500x smaller datasets!
Traditionally (by which I mean "in the last few months"), GUI agents have been trained with supervised fine-tuning (SFT). This meant, collecting huge datasets of screen captures from people using computers, and using these to fine-tune your model. ๐
๐ But last week, a new paper introduced UI-R1, applying DeepSeek's R1-style rule-based reinforcement learning (RL) specifically to GUI action prediction tasks.
This is big news: with RL, maybe we could build good agents without the need for huge datasets.
UI-R1 uses a unified reward function that evaluates multiple responses from models, optimizing via policy algorithms like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO).
Specifically, the reward function assesses:
๐ฏ Action type accuracy: Does the predicted action match the ground truth?
๐ Coordinate accuracy (specifically for clicks): Is the predicted click within the correct bounding box?
๐ Output format: Does the model clearly articulate both its reasoning and final action?
Using just 136 carefully selected mobile tasksโcompared to 76,000 tasks for larger models like OS-AtlasโUI-R1 shows significant efficiency and improved performance:
๐ Boosted action prediction accuracy from 76% to 89% on AndroidControl.
๐ Outperformed larger, SFT-trained models (e.g., OS-Atlas-7B), demonstrating superior results with vastly fewer data points (136 tasks vs. 76K).
๐ Enhanced adaptability and generalization, excelling even in out-of-domain scenarios.
The paper tests this RL-based method only in low-level GUI tasks. Could it generalize to more complex interactions? ๐ง
Read the full paper here ๐ UI-R1: Enhancing Action Prediction of GUI Agents by Reinforcement Learning (2503.21620)
Traditionally (by which I mean "in the last few months"), GUI agents have been trained with supervised fine-tuning (SFT). This meant, collecting huge datasets of screen captures from people using computers, and using these to fine-tune your model. ๐
๐ But last week, a new paper introduced UI-R1, applying DeepSeek's R1-style rule-based reinforcement learning (RL) specifically to GUI action prediction tasks.
This is big news: with RL, maybe we could build good agents without the need for huge datasets.
UI-R1 uses a unified reward function that evaluates multiple responses from models, optimizing via policy algorithms like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO).
Specifically, the reward function assesses:
๐ฏ Action type accuracy: Does the predicted action match the ground truth?
๐ Coordinate accuracy (specifically for clicks): Is the predicted click within the correct bounding box?
๐ Output format: Does the model clearly articulate both its reasoning and final action?
Using just 136 carefully selected mobile tasksโcompared to 76,000 tasks for larger models like OS-AtlasโUI-R1 shows significant efficiency and improved performance:
๐ Boosted action prediction accuracy from 76% to 89% on AndroidControl.
๐ Outperformed larger, SFT-trained models (e.g., OS-Atlas-7B), demonstrating superior results with vastly fewer data points (136 tasks vs. 76K).
๐ Enhanced adaptability and generalization, excelling even in out-of-domain scenarios.
The paper tests this RL-based method only in low-level GUI tasks. Could it generalize to more complex interactions? ๐ง
Read the full paper here ๐ UI-R1: Enhancing Action Prediction of GUI Agents by Reinforcement Learning (2503.21620)
Post
2055
โผ๏ธ huggingface_hub's v0.30.0 is out with our biggest update of the past two years!
Full release notes: https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/releases/tag/v0.30.0.
๐ Ready. Xet. Go!
Xet is a groundbreaking new protocol for storing large objects in Git repositories, designed to replace Git LFS. Unlike LFS, which deduplicates files, Xet operates at the chunk levelโmaking it a game-changer for AI builders collaborating on massive models and datasets. Our Python integration is powered by [xet-core](https://github.com/huggingface/xet-core), a Rust-based package that handles all the low-level details.
You can start using Xet today by installing the optional dependency:
With that, you can seamlessly download files from Xet-enabled repositories! And donโt worryโeverything remains fully backward-compatible if youโre not ready to upgrade yet.
Blog post: https://huggingface.co/blog/xet-on-the-hub
Docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/storage-backends#xet
โก Inference Providers
- Weโre thrilled to introduce Cerebras and Cohere as official inference providers! This expansion strengthens the Hub as the go-to entry point for running inference on open-weight models.
- Novita is now our 3rd provider to support text-to-video task after Fal.ai and Replicate.
- Centralized billing: manage your budget and set team-wide spending limits for Inference Providers! Available to all Enterprise Hub organizations.
- No more timeouts when generating videos, thanks to async calls. Available right now for Fal.ai, expecting more providers to leverage the same structure very soon!
Full release notes: https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/releases/tag/v0.30.0.
๐ Ready. Xet. Go!
Xet is a groundbreaking new protocol for storing large objects in Git repositories, designed to replace Git LFS. Unlike LFS, which deduplicates files, Xet operates at the chunk levelโmaking it a game-changer for AI builders collaborating on massive models and datasets. Our Python integration is powered by [xet-core](https://github.com/huggingface/xet-core), a Rust-based package that handles all the low-level details.
You can start using Xet today by installing the optional dependency:
pip install -U huggingface_hub[hf_xet]With that, you can seamlessly download files from Xet-enabled repositories! And donโt worryโeverything remains fully backward-compatible if youโre not ready to upgrade yet.
Blog post: https://huggingface.co/blog/xet-on-the-hub
Docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/storage-backends#xet
โก Inference Providers
- Weโre thrilled to introduce Cerebras and Cohere as official inference providers! This expansion strengthens the Hub as the go-to entry point for running inference on open-weight models.
- Novita is now our 3rd provider to support text-to-video task after Fal.ai and Replicate.
- Centralized billing: manage your budget and set team-wide spending limits for Inference Providers! Available to all Enterprise Hub organizations.
from huggingface_hub import InferenceClient
client = InferenceClient(provider="fal-ai", bill_to="my-cool-company")
image = client.text_to_image(
"A majestic lion in a fantasy forest",
model="black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-schnell",
)
image.save("lion.png")- No more timeouts when generating videos, thanks to async calls. Available right now for Fal.ai, expecting more providers to leverage the same structure very soon!
- 6 replies
Post
4823
smolagents now support vLLM! ๐ฅณ
As one of the most popular local inference solutions, the community had been asking us to integrate vLLM: after a heavy refactoring of our LLM classes, we've just released smolagents 1.11.0, with a brand new VLLMModel class.
Go try it and tell us what you think!
https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents/blob/45b2c86857b7f7657daaa74e4d17d347e9e2c4a4/src/smolagents/models.py#L497
As one of the most popular local inference solutions, the community had been asking us to integrate vLLM: after a heavy refactoring of our LLM classes, we've just released smolagents 1.11.0, with a brand new VLLMModel class.
Go try it and tell us what you think!
https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents/blob/45b2c86857b7f7657daaa74e4d17d347e9e2c4a4/src/smolagents/models.py#L497
raphael-glย
published
a
model
about 1 month ago
Post
1034
Our new Agentic leaderboard is now live!๐ฅ
If you ever asked which LLM is best for powering agents, we've just made a leaderboard that ranks them all! Built with @albertvillanova , this ranks LLMs powering a smolagents CodeAgent on subsets of various benchmarks. โ
๐ GPT-4.5 comes on top, even beating reasoning models like DeepSeek-R1 or o1. And Claude-3.7-Sonnet is a close second!
The leaderboard also allows you to show the scores of vanilla LLMs (without any agentic setup) on the same benchmarks: this shows the huge improvements brought by agentic setups. ๐ช
(Note that results will be added manually, so the leaderboard might not always have the latest LLMs)
If you ever asked which LLM is best for powering agents, we've just made a leaderboard that ranks them all! Built with @albertvillanova , this ranks LLMs powering a smolagents CodeAgent on subsets of various benchmarks. โ
๐ GPT-4.5 comes on top, even beating reasoning models like DeepSeek-R1 or o1. And Claude-3.7-Sonnet is a close second!
The leaderboard also allows you to show the scores of vanilla LLMs (without any agentic setup) on the same benchmarks: this shows the huge improvements brought by agentic setups. ๐ช
(Note that results will be added manually, so the leaderboard might not always have the latest LLMs)
- 1 reply
alvarobarttย
posted
an
update
about 2 months ago
Post
3027
๐ฅ Agents can do anything!
@microsoft
Research just announced the release of Magma 8B!
Magma is a new Visual Language Model (VLM) with 8B parameters for multi-modal agents designed to handle complex interactions across virtual and real environments; and it's MIT licensed!
Magma comes with exciting new features such as:
- Introduces the Set-of-Mark and Trace-of-Mark techniques for fine-tuning
- Leverages a large amount of unlabeled video data to learn the spatial-temporal grounding and planning
- A strong generalization and ability to be fine-tuned for other agentic tasks
- SOTA in different multi-modal benchmarks spanning across UI navigation, robotics manipulation, image / video understanding and spatial understanding and reasoning
- Generates goal-driven visual plans and actions for agentic use cases
Model: microsoft/Magma-8B
Technical Report: Magma: A Foundation Model for Multimodal AI Agents (2502.13130)
Magma is a new Visual Language Model (VLM) with 8B parameters for multi-modal agents designed to handle complex interactions across virtual and real environments; and it's MIT licensed!
Magma comes with exciting new features such as:
- Introduces the Set-of-Mark and Trace-of-Mark techniques for fine-tuning
- Leverages a large amount of unlabeled video data to learn the spatial-temporal grounding and planning
- A strong generalization and ability to be fine-tuned for other agentic tasks
- SOTA in different multi-modal benchmarks spanning across UI navigation, robotics manipulation, image / video understanding and spatial understanding and reasoning
- Generates goal-driven visual plans and actions for agentic use cases
Model: microsoft/Magma-8B
Technical Report: Magma: A Foundation Model for Multimodal AI Agents (2502.13130)
Post
4822
We now have a Deep Research for academia: SurveyX automatically writes academic surveys nearly indistinguishable from human-written ones ๐ฅ
Researchers from Beijing and Shanghai just published the first application of a deep research system to academia: their algorithm, given a question, can give you a survey of all papers on the subject.
To make a research survey, you generally follow two steps, preparation (collect and organize papers) and writing (outline creation, writing, polishing). Researchers followed the same two steps and automated them.
๐ฏ For the preparation part, a key part is find all the important references on the given subject.
Researchers first cast a wide net of all relevant papers. But then finding the really important ones is like distilling knowledge from a haystack of information. To solve this challenge, they built an โAttributeTreeโ object that structures key information from citations. Ablating these AttributeTrees significantly decreased structure and synthesis scores, so they were really useful!
๐ For the writing part, key was to get a synthesis that's both short and true. This is not easy to get with LLMs! So they used methods like LLM-based deduplication to shorten the too verbose listings made by LLMs, and RAG to grab original quotes instead of made-up ones.
As a result, their system outperforms previous approaches by far!
As assessed by LLM-judges, the quality score os SurveyX even approaches this of human experts, with 4.59/5 vs 4.75/5 ๐
I advise you to read the paper, it's a great overview of the kind of assistants that we'll get in the short future! ๐ SurveyX: Academic Survey Automation via Large Language Models (2502.14776)
Their website shows examples of generated surveys ๐ http://www.surveyx.cn/
Researchers from Beijing and Shanghai just published the first application of a deep research system to academia: their algorithm, given a question, can give you a survey of all papers on the subject.
To make a research survey, you generally follow two steps, preparation (collect and organize papers) and writing (outline creation, writing, polishing). Researchers followed the same two steps and automated them.
๐ฏ For the preparation part, a key part is find all the important references on the given subject.
Researchers first cast a wide net of all relevant papers. But then finding the really important ones is like distilling knowledge from a haystack of information. To solve this challenge, they built an โAttributeTreeโ object that structures key information from citations. Ablating these AttributeTrees significantly decreased structure and synthesis scores, so they were really useful!
๐ For the writing part, key was to get a synthesis that's both short and true. This is not easy to get with LLMs! So they used methods like LLM-based deduplication to shorten the too verbose listings made by LLMs, and RAG to grab original quotes instead of made-up ones.
As a result, their system outperforms previous approaches by far!
As assessed by LLM-judges, the quality score os SurveyX even approaches this of human experts, with 4.59/5 vs 4.75/5 ๐
I advise you to read the paper, it's a great overview of the kind of assistants that we'll get in the short future! ๐ SurveyX: Academic Survey Automation via Large Language Models (2502.14776)
Their website shows examples of generated surveys ๐ http://www.surveyx.cn/
Post
3089
Less is More for Reasoning (LIMO): a 32B model fine-tuned with 817 examples can beat o1-preview on math reasoning! ๐คฏ
Do we really need o1's huge RL procedure to see reasoning emerge? It seems not.
Researchers from Shanghai Jiaotong University just demonstrated that carefully selected examples can boost math performance in large language models using SFT โno huge datasets or RL procedures needed.
Their procedure allows Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct to jump from 6.5% to 57% on AIME and from 59% to 95% on MATH, while using only 1% of the data in previous approaches.
โก The Less-is-More Reasoning Hypothesis:
โฃ Minimal but precise examples that showcase optimal reasoning patterns matter more than sheer quantity
โฃ Pre-training knowledge plus sufficient computational resources at inference levels up math skills
โก๏ธ Core techniques:
โฃ High-quality reasoning chains with self-verification steps
โฃ 817 handpicked problems that encourage deeper reasoning
โฃ Enough inference-time computation to allow extended reasoning
๐ช Efficiency gains:
โฃ Only 817 examples instead of 100k+
โฃ 40.5% absolute improvement across 10 diverse benchmarks, outperforming models trained on 100x more data
This really challenges the notion that SFT leads to memorization rather than generalization! And opens up reasoning to GPU-poor researchers ๐
Read the full paper here ๐ย LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning (2502.03387)
Do we really need o1's huge RL procedure to see reasoning emerge? It seems not.
Researchers from Shanghai Jiaotong University just demonstrated that carefully selected examples can boost math performance in large language models using SFT โno huge datasets or RL procedures needed.
Their procedure allows Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct to jump from 6.5% to 57% on AIME and from 59% to 95% on MATH, while using only 1% of the data in previous approaches.
โก The Less-is-More Reasoning Hypothesis:
โฃ Minimal but precise examples that showcase optimal reasoning patterns matter more than sheer quantity
โฃ Pre-training knowledge plus sufficient computational resources at inference levels up math skills
โก๏ธ Core techniques:
โฃ High-quality reasoning chains with self-verification steps
โฃ 817 handpicked problems that encourage deeper reasoning
โฃ Enough inference-time computation to allow extended reasoning
๐ช Efficiency gains:
โฃ Only 817 examples instead of 100k+
โฃ 40.5% absolute improvement across 10 diverse benchmarks, outperforming models trained on 100x more data
This really challenges the notion that SFT leads to memorization rather than generalization! And opens up reasoning to GPU-poor researchers ๐
Read the full paper here ๐ย LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning (2502.03387)
Post
2945
๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ๐: you can now share agents to the Hub! ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ
And any agent pushed to Hub get a cool Space interface to directly chat with it.
This was a real technical challenge: for instance, serializing tools to export them meant that you needed to get all the source code for a tool, verify that it was standalone (not relying on external variables), and gathering all the packages required to make it run.
Go try it out! ๐ https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents
And any agent pushed to Hub get a cool Space interface to directly chat with it.
This was a real technical challenge: for instance, serializing tools to export them meant that you needed to get all the source code for a tool, verify that it was standalone (not relying on external variables), and gathering all the packages required to make it run.
Go try it out! ๐ https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents
- 2 replies
Post
2548
For those who haven't come across it yet, here's a handy trick to discuss an entire GitHub repo with an LLM:
=> Just replace "github" with "gitingest" in the url, and you get the whole repo as a single string that you can then paste in your LLMs
=> Just replace "github" with "gitingest" in the url, and you get the whole repo as a single string that you can then paste in your LLMs
Post
4859
"๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐": this statement has often been made, here are numbers to support it.
I've plotted the progress of AI agents on GAIA test set, and it seems they're headed to catch up with the human baseline in early 2026.
And that progress is still driven mostly by the improvement of base LLMs: progress would be even faster with fine-tuned agentic models.
I've plotted the progress of AI agents on GAIA test set, and it seems they're headed to catch up with the human baseline in early 2026.
And that progress is still driven mostly by the improvement of base LLMs: progress would be even faster with fine-tuned agentic models.
Post
3760
๐๐ฑ๐๐ฒ๐ป'๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ธ-๐ฅ๐ญ ๐๐๐ฟ๐๐ด๐ด๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ ๐๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐! โ
โก๏ธ How well do reasoning models perform on agentic tasks? Until now, all indicators seemed to show that they worked really well. On our recent reproduction of Deep Search, OpenAI's o1 was by far the best model to power an agentic system.
So when our partner Adyen built a huge benchmark of 450 data science tasks, and built data agents with smolagents to test different models, I expected reasoning models like o1 or DeepSeek-R1 to destroy the tasks at hand.
๐ But they really missed the mark. DeepSeek-R1 only got 1 or 2 out of 10 questions correct. Similarly, o1 was only at ~13% correct answers.
๐ง These results really surprised us. We thoroughly checked them, we even thought our APIs for DeepSeek were broken and colleagues Leandro Anton helped me start custom instances of R1 on our own H100s to make sure it worked well.
But there seemed to be no mistake. Reasoning LLMs actually did not seem that smart. Often, these models made basic mistakes, like forgetting the content of a folder that they had just explored, misspelling file names, or hallucinating data. Even though they do great at exploring webpages through several steps, the same level of multi-step planning seemed much harder to achieve when reasoning over files and data.
It seems like there's still lots of work to do in the Agents x Data space. Congrats to Adyen for this great benchmark, looking forward to see people proposing better agents! ๐
Read more in the blog post ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/dabstep
โก๏ธ How well do reasoning models perform on agentic tasks? Until now, all indicators seemed to show that they worked really well. On our recent reproduction of Deep Search, OpenAI's o1 was by far the best model to power an agentic system.
So when our partner Adyen built a huge benchmark of 450 data science tasks, and built data agents with smolagents to test different models, I expected reasoning models like o1 or DeepSeek-R1 to destroy the tasks at hand.
๐ But they really missed the mark. DeepSeek-R1 only got 1 or 2 out of 10 questions correct. Similarly, o1 was only at ~13% correct answers.
๐ง These results really surprised us. We thoroughly checked them, we even thought our APIs for DeepSeek were broken and colleagues Leandro Anton helped me start custom instances of R1 on our own H100s to make sure it worked well.
But there seemed to be no mistake. Reasoning LLMs actually did not seem that smart. Often, these models made basic mistakes, like forgetting the content of a folder that they had just explored, misspelling file names, or hallucinating data. Even though they do great at exploring webpages through several steps, the same level of multi-step planning seemed much harder to achieve when reasoning over files and data.
It seems like there's still lots of work to do in the Agents x Data space. Congrats to Adyen for this great benchmark, looking forward to see people proposing better agents! ๐
Read more in the blog post ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/dabstep
reach-vbย
authored
a
paper
2 months ago
Post
9877
Introducing ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฝ-๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต by Hugging Face! ๐ฅ
OpenAI's latest agentic app Deep Research seems really good... But it's closed, as usual.
โฑ๏ธ So with a team of cracked colleagues, we set ourselves a 24hours deadline to replicate and open-source Deep Research! โฑ๏ธ
โก๏ธ We built open-Deep-Research, an entirely open agent that can: navigate the web autonomously, scroll and search through pages, download and manipulate files, run calculation on data...
We aimed for the best performance: are the agent's answers really rigorous?
On GAIA benchmark, Deep Research had 67% accuracy on the validation set.
โก๏ธ open Deep Research is at 55% (powered by o1), it is:
- the best pass@1 solution submitted
- the best open solution ๐ช๐ช
And it's only getting started ! Please jump in, drop PRs, and let's bring it to the top !
Read the blog post ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/open-deep-research
OpenAI's latest agentic app Deep Research seems really good... But it's closed, as usual.
โฑ๏ธ So with a team of cracked colleagues, we set ourselves a 24hours deadline to replicate and open-source Deep Research! โฑ๏ธ
โก๏ธ We built open-Deep-Research, an entirely open agent that can: navigate the web autonomously, scroll and search through pages, download and manipulate files, run calculation on data...
We aimed for the best performance: are the agent's answers really rigorous?
On GAIA benchmark, Deep Research had 67% accuracy on the validation set.
โก๏ธ open Deep Research is at 55% (powered by o1), it is:
- the best pass@1 solution submitted
- the best open solution ๐ช๐ช
And it's only getting started ! Please jump in, drop PRs, and let's bring it to the top !
Read the blog post ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/open-deep-research
Post
3148
Now you can launch a code agent directly from your terminal!
โจ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ "๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐" directly launches a CodeAgent
โถ๏ธ This also works with web agents (replace ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ with ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐) thanks to @merve !
๐พ Another treat from smolagents release 1.7.0:
Now agents have a memory mechanism, enabling many possibilities like replaying the last run with ๐๐๐๐๐.๐๐๐๐๐๐ข(), thank you @clefourrier !
Check the release notes here ๐ https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents/releases/tag/v1.7.0
โจ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ "๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐" directly launches a CodeAgent
โถ๏ธ This also works with web agents (replace ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ with ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐) thanks to @merve !
๐พ Another treat from smolagents release 1.7.0:
Now agents have a memory mechanism, enabling many possibilities like replaying the last run with ๐๐๐๐๐.๐๐๐๐๐๐ข(), thank you @clefourrier !
Check the release notes here ๐ https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents/releases/tag/v1.7.0
Post
1740
We published https://huggingface.co/blog/deepseek-r1-aws!
If you are using AWS, give a read. It is a running document to showcase how to deploy and fine-tune DeepSeek R1 models with Hugging Face on AWS.
We're working hard to enable all the scenarios, whether you want to deploy to Inference Endpoints, Sagemaker or EC2; with GPUs or with Trainium & Inferentia.
We have full support for the distilled models, DeepSeek-R1 support is coming soon!! I'll keep you posted.
Cheers
If you are using AWS, give a read. It is a running document to showcase how to deploy and fine-tune DeepSeek R1 models with Hugging Face on AWS.
We're working hard to enable all the scenarios, whether you want to deploy to Inference Endpoints, Sagemaker or EC2; with GPUs or with Trainium & Inferentia.
We have full support for the distilled models, DeepSeek-R1 support is coming soon!! I'll keep you posted.
Cheers
- 1 reply
Post
4105
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฏ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฒ๐
๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐!
โ Hosting our own inference was not enough: now the Hub 4 new inference providers: fal, Replicate, SambaNova Systems, & Together AI.
Check model cards on the Hub: you can now, in 1 click, use inference from various providers (cf video demo)
Their inference can also be used through our Inference API client. There, you can use either your custom provider key, or your HF token, then billing will be handled directly on your HF account, as a way to centralize all expenses.
๐ธ Also, PRO users get 2$ inference credits per month!
Read more in the announcement ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/inference-providers
โ Hosting our own inference was not enough: now the Hub 4 new inference providers: fal, Replicate, SambaNova Systems, & Together AI.
Check model cards on the Hub: you can now, in 1 click, use inference from various providers (cf video demo)
Their inference can also be used through our Inference API client. There, you can use either your custom provider key, or your HF token, then billing will be handled directly on your HF account, as a way to centralize all expenses.
๐ธ Also, PRO users get 2$ inference credits per month!
Read more in the announcement ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/inference-providers
- 1 reply